Home

About the Peace Forum

Speakers

Performers

Exhibitors

Programme

BOOKINGS

The Earth Charter

About the Organisers

Who should attend?

Media Releases

Photos

Testimonials

About Mahatma Gandhi

Sponsorship

What you can do to help

Contact Us

 

Arun Gandhi

Founder and President
M.K.Gandhi Institute for Nonviolence

 
 

Sometimes when I look at the state of the world today and all the violence that is perpetrated by human beings I wonder if we will ever learn from the wisdom of sages of the past who tried desperately during their lifetime to show us a more honorable, a more harmonious and a more peaceful way of life. It was not just my grandfather, Mohandas K. Gandhi, who talked about nonviolence but Jesus, Buddha, Mahavira, Mohammed and scores of others. Yet, while we worship these people we contemptuously dismiss their message as irrelevant today. The question that we have to ask ourselves is: why do we worship people whose message is meaningless and irrelevant?

The philosophy of nonviolence that grandfather put together after reading all the scriptures of the world is one that is based on love, respect, understanding, appreciation, compassion and commitment -- all positive principles. So, when we ask the question: Is nonviolence relevant today we are in fact asking is love, respect, understanding, compassion and commitment relevant today? If we can honestly say that these positive principles are not relevant today then there is no hope for humanity. In which case all our passion for religion and prayer is a wasted effort. However, fortunately, not all of us are selfish and self-centered and so there is a modicum of hope for humanity.

For too long humanity all over the world has been consumed by prejudice, hate, apathy, ignorance, fear, mistrust, deception, greed, guilt and an exploitative nature all of which breed violence. We commit violence in many different ways. There is the physical violence -- wars, killing, beating, murders, rape etc. and then the passive violence where we don't use any physical force but nevertheless hurt people through our insensitive attitude. My grandfather taught me that it is passive violence that fuels the fire of physical violence so, logically, if we wish to put out the fire of physical violence we need to cut off the fuel supply. Therefore, we must be the change we wish to see in the world.

Instead of being the change and finding ways to live in harmony we as individuals and as nations want to change the rest of the world into our image religiously, economically and politically giving rise to a great deal of conflict. The United States has been pursuing a foreign policy based on arrogance and the United Kingdom is a willing partner in this negative and evil design. The United States discovered terrorism on September 11, 2001, and now wants to kill terrorism. Yet no one knows how to define terrorism nor do we know how to put a face on a terrorist. A terrorist could be living next door; to an abused child an insensitive parent could be a terrorist; to a woman a rapist is a terrorist and the list can go on and on. So, should we assume that all parents are evil and all men are rapists?

Because we want quick and easy justice we resort to "an eye for an eye" which is what has made all the world blind. Justice should not mean revenge, it should mean reformation. We are told that harsh laws and severe punishment will deter people from crime. We have practiced this philosophy for generations and in fact crime has only increased in volume and severity and so has the punishment. This is because we have focused on the person instead of the problem. Enlarge this point of view to the international level and we have the same insensitive reaction.

Violent gangs around the world have flourished on the principle "if you are not with us you are against us." Gang leaders believe those who are against us are dispensable and must be eliminated. As a super-power the United States and as an ally the United Kingdom are now displaying the propensities of gang leaders. We once wanted to eliminate the Taliban and Bin Laden but since they have disappeared our focus has changed to Saddam Hussein. The attitude smacks of our compulsive desire to "make someone pay for what happened to us."

After September 11 I wrote an article "Nonviolence and Terrorism" which is on our website -- http://www.gandhiinstitute/.org -- since no one wanted to publish it. The gist of the article is that this is not the time for a civilized nation to declare war on terrorism and kill a lot of innocent people but to do some honest introspection to find out why people around the world hate us so much as to want to destroy us. There are many reasons but the one the people of the world hate the most is our arrogance that leads us to believe that we can bully and bend people to our will and our excessive desires. Ultimately, it is our arrogance that will destroy us because one half of the world cannot survive if the other half is allowed to perish.


 
   



© 2002 World Peace Forum 2003, all rights reserved.